MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of end effect under loading in the intermediate principal stress direction on strainburst behaviors of Beishan granite

2020· article· en· W3102989044 on OpenAlexaff
Xingguang Zhao, Ju Wang, Ming Cai, SU Guo-sao

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialPrincipal stressLubricantStress (linguistics)Geotechnical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, strainburst tests on Beishan granite under different intermediate principal stress (σ 2) loadings were performed using a true-triaxial rockburst system. Rectangular prism specimens were prepared and divided into two groups. For the first group, the specimens were in direct contact with platens. For the second group, the specimen surfaces loaded by σ 2 were daubed with a layer of lubricant to reduce the end friction of the platens. A loading mode, which kept one specimen surface free and applied loads on the other five surfaces of the specimen, was used to simulate the stress state of a rock element on the excavation boundary. A high-speed video camera was then used to capture the failure process of the specimens. The experimental results indicated that as σ 2 increased, the degree of violence of the specimens during failure increases. However, the σ 2-dependent strength and energy release characteristics of the lubricated specimens were significantly different from those of the non-lubricated specimens. The strength of the lubricated specimens was lower than that of the non-lubricated specimens under a given σ 2, and the strength difference between them increased as σ 2 increased. Moreover, the kinetic energy difference of the rock fragments between the non-lubricated and lubricated specimens increased with increasing σ 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207