Elucidating the early signaling cues involved in zebrafish chondrogenesis and cartilage morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Across the teleost skeleton, cartilages are diverse in their composition suggesting subtle differences in their developmental mechanisms. This study aims to elucidate the regulatory role of bone morphogenetic protein (BMPs) during the morphogenesis of two cartilage elements in zebrafish: the scleral cartilage in the eye and the caudal fin endoskeleton. Zebrafish larvae were exposed to a BMP inhibitor (LDN193189) at a series of timepoints preceding the initial appearance of the scleral cartilage and caudal fin endoskeleton. Morphological assessments of the cartilages in later stages, revealed that BMP-inhibited fish harbored striking disruptions in caudal fin endoskeletal morphology, regardless of the age at which the inhibitor treatment was performed. In contrast, scleral cartilage morphology was unaffected in all age groups. Morphometric and principal component analysis, performed on the caudal fin endoskeleton, revealed differential clustering of principal components one and two in BMP-inhibited and control fish. Additionally, the expression of sox9a and sox9b were reduced in BMP-inhibited fish when compared to controls, indicating that LDN193189 acts via a Sox9-dependent pathway. Further examination of notochord flexion also revealed a disruptive effect of BMP inhibition on this process. This study provides a detailed characterization of the effects of BMP inhibition via LDN193189 on zebrafish cartilage morphogenesis and development. It highlights the specific, localized role of the BMP-signaling pathways during the development of different cartilage elements and sheds some light on the morphological characteristics of fossil teleosts that together suggest an uncoupling of the developmental processes between the upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".