MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Factors Leading to Increased Algal Production in Mountain Lakes: A Paleolimnological Perspective from the Uinta Mountains, Utah, USA

2020· article· en· W3103261581 on OpenAlexaff
Katrina A. Moser, Elizabeth J. Hundey, Maria Eloisa Sia, Rebecca M. Doyle, H.J.F van Dunné, Fred J. Longstaffe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentEnvironmental scienceProductivityEcosystemDiatomPaleolimnologyNutrientPhytoplanktonEutrophicationDeposition (geology)Lake ecosystemAlgaeAlgal bloomEcologyOceanographyGeologyBiologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mountain lakes are often remote, located in environments that experience cold temperatures, high incident solar and ultraviolet radiation, and prolonged ice and snow cover. They are, therefore, frequently dilute and oligotrophic. Together these factors can affect mountain lake ecosystem structure, diversity, and productivity. However, distant human activities resulting in atmospheric pollution, as well as more local disturbances, such as fish stocking, potentially increase nutrient inputs and alter mountain lake ecosystems. Our research addresses how these human activities have altered algal production in Uinta Mountain (Utah, USA) lakes. Sedimentary chlorophyll a and its derivatives were measured using visible reflectance spectroscopy in short sediment cores from a total of 12 lakes, including both alpine and subalpine lakes, to determine trends in algal production. All sediment cores were dated using 210Pb and 14C dating, and the records were shown to extend back 300 to 500 years. Our results show that regardless of whether lakes were stocked or not, algal production remained virtually unchanged until 1950 when it increased dramatically in most lakes. The widespread distribution of the sites points to a regional stressor, such as atmospheric deposition of nutrients, as being the main cause for increased algal production. Additional analyses, including diatoms and C and N isotopes, measured in sediments from some lakes support this finding. The few lakes where algal production trends differed showed either that algal production had changed little overtime or that it was variable throughout the record. Although speculative, the lake that showed unchanged algal production is surrounded by a wetland that may have contributed nitrogen to the lake throughout the record meaning that additional nitrogen had little effect on algal production. Lakes with more variable algal production were subalpine lakes. The variable trend may point to more complex pathways and transport of nitrogen from the catchment to the lakes at lower elevation sites. Our findings show that remote mountain lakes, which typically are important water resources and biodiversity hotspots, are rapidly changing as a result of human activities, but not all of these lakes are responding in the same way. To effectively protect mountain lakes it will be important to identify and quantify influential factors affecting lake response to anthropogenic stressors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics→French-language works237,207→