MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103452638 · doi:10.48090/ciki.v1i1.913

FRONT-END OF INNOVATION METRICS: RESEARCH QUESTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW

2020· article· pt· W3103452638 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnais ... Congresso Internacional do Conhecimento e Inovação · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureIGNIS Innovation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesBusinessArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Em muitas empresas, reduzir os custos de fabricação para otimizar os lucros é uma estratégia comum usada para competir no mercado, sempre procurando reduzir os custos de fabricação e aumentar os lucros de ano para ano.No entanto, olhar para a otimização de custos não é mais eficaz à medida que novos concorrentes surgem no mercado que fornecem mais valor aos clientes. As empresas também devem competir impulsionando a inovação em produtos e serviços para se manterem competitivas no mercado. Para gerenciar e avaliar com eficácia o desempenho de um pipeline de inovação, ele deve ser medido, o que se torna difícil devido à falta de abordagens padronizadas.As seguintes três dimensões da FEI são investigadas neste artigo:• Modelos• Métricas• Linguagem comum

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it