Development of a Planar Shipboard Skid-Equipped Rotary-Wing Aircraft Manoeuvring and Securing Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In maritime shipboard operations, the typical `skid-type' landing gear of unmanned aircraft systems constrain mechanical securing and traversing options, and present complex ship-helicopter interface behaviour which must be characterized. The planar case of a dynamic interface package named SRAMSS (Skid-equipped Rotary-wing Aircraft Manoeuvring and Securing Simulation) has been developed. SRAMSS models the aircraft as a mass-coupled rigid airframe and flexible landing gear by integration of dynamic finite element modelling into Kane's method. Oriented ship-aircraft contact dynamics is modelled by a Separation Axis Theorem algorithm. Aerodynamic drag, and rotor blade element models complete the modelling of the embarked aircraft. Verification of SRAMSS confirms the proper implementation of the included models. Preliminary validation of the rotor model against published data indicates the need for refinement. Nevertheless, this work verifies a suitable system formulation methodology for a state-of-the-art fully-spatial dynamic interface simulation package for skid-equipped rotary-wing aircraft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".