MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3103752848 · doi:10.16995/dscn.376

Berlin Remix – A Computationally Generative “City Film” Artwork

2020· article· en· W3103752848 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jim Bizzocchi

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Studies / Le champ numérique · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSymphonyGenerative grammarTheme (computing)ArtVisual artsStyle (visual arts)Art historyAmerican filmFilm festivalFilm studiesMovie theaterComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Berlin Remix is a computationally generative artwork that creates and presents a series of short films re-edited and re-mixed from the archetypal “City Film” documentary Berlin: Symphony of a Great City (Ruttman 1927). The “City Film” is an historical documentary genre. These City films thrived in the late 20s and 30s, and continue to this day. Each of them documented the daily life of an individual city. The central film in the development of this genre is Ruttman’s Berlin. Berlin Remix is a generative artwork that re-mixes the individual shots of the original film into a series of shorter films. Each of these shorter films differs from the others in specific content, cinematic style, or both. Each of the derived films shows a single facet or theme contained within the larger film. The final form of the artwork will run completely autonomously, generating the series of shorter films in real time. The artwork as exhibited at CSDH/SCHN 2019 required a moderate amount of human intervention to join the system’s output segments into short films. RésuméLe Berlin Remix est une oeuvre d’art informatiquement générative qui crée et présente une série de films courts remodifiés et remixés venant du documentaire de l’archétype « film de ville » (City Film) qui s’appelle Berlin : Symphony of a Great City (Ruttman 1927). Le « film de ville » est un genre documentaire historique. Ces films de ville s’épanouissaient pendant la fin des années 1920 et 1930, et aujourd’hui encore. Le film central du développement de ce genre est celui de Ruttman, nommé Berlin. Le Berlin Remix est une oeuvre d’art générative qui remixe les images individuelles du film original en série de films plus courts. Chacun de ces films plus courts varie l’un des autres selon le contexte spécifique, selon le style cinématographique, ou selon les deux à la fois. Chacun des films dérivés montre une facette ou un thème unique, confiné dans le film entier. La forme finale de cette oeuvre d’art fonctionnera de façon autonome, générant la série de films plus courts en temps réel. L’oeuvre d’art, comme exposé à CSDH/SCHN 2019, a exigé une quantité modérée d’intervention humaine afin de transformer la production de séquences du système en films courts. Mots clés: art vidéo; art générative; esthétics; cinématographique, filmdocumentaire; média numérique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Studies / Le champ numériqueSame topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207