3.2 mm lightcurve observations of (4) Vesta and (9) Metis with the Australia Telescope Compact Array
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Received TBD; accepted TBD Context. (4) Vesta and (9) Metis are large main-belt asteroids with high albedos. There are strong indications for heterogeneous surfaces for both targets from imaging techniques in the visible and near-IR range, very likely connected to impact structures. Despite that, the thermal spectral energy distributions from mid-IR to the mm-range have, until now, been consistent with a homogeneous regolith-covered surface and the thermal light-curves are dominated by the shape and spin vector properties. Aims. With millimetre-observations at 93.0 and 95.5 GHz we tried to characterise the emission properties of the surface material. The coverage of the full rotation period allowed a detailed study of the heterogeneity of the surface. Methods. We combined our carefully-calibrated mm-observations with sophisticated thermophysical modelling techniques. In this way it was possible to derive emissivity properties and to disentangle the effects caused by shape, albedo or various thermal properties. Results. The rotationally averaged fluxes are explained very well by our thermophysical model techniques when using an emissivity in the mm-range of about 0.6 for (4) Vesta and about 0.7 for (9) Metis. The mm-lightcurves follow for a large fraction of the rotation period the shapeintroduced variations. The rotational phases with clear deviations are connected to structures which are visible in the HST images of (4) Vesta and the Keck AO-images of (9) Metis. The observed lightcurve amplitudes are peak-to-peak∼30 % for (4) Vesta and∼25 % for (9) Metis, while the shape-related amplitudes are only 5 and 4%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".