MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104032557

Ladder operators and coherent states for multi-step supersymmetric rational extensions of the truncated oscillator

2019· article· en· W3104032557 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQueensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoherent statesAlgebra over a fieldMathematical physicsMathematicsHarmonic oscillatorPhysicsPure mathematicsTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct ladder operators, C and C†, for a multistep rational extension of the harmonic oscillator on the half plane, x ≥ 0. These ladder operators connect all states of the spectrum in only infinite-dimensional representations of their polynomial Heisenberg algebra. For comparison, we also construct two different classes of ladder operator acting on this system that form finite-dimensional as well as infinite-dimensional representations of their respective polynomial Heisenberg algebras. For the rational extension, we construct the position wavefunctions in terms of exceptional orthogonal polynomials. For a particular choice of parameters and for the three lowest weights μ = -5, -3, and 5, we construct the coherent states, eigenvectors of C with generally complex eigenvalues, z, as superposition of subsets of the energy eigenvectors. Then, we calculate the properties of these coherent states, looking for classical or nonclassical behavior. We calculate the energy expectations as functions of |z|. We plot position probability densities for the coherent states and for the even and odd cat states formed from these coherent states. We plot the Wigner functions for a particular choice of z. For these coherent states on one arm of a beamsplitter, we calculate the two excitation number distributions and the linear entropies of the output states. We plot the standard deviations in x and find squeezing in the regime considered in one of the cases. By plotting the Mandel Q parameters for the coherent states as functions of |z|, we find that the number statistics is sub-Poissonian in all cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQueensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)Same topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207