Discovery of Strong Lensing by an Elliptical Galaxy at z=0.0345
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
- Consensus categories
- Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: ObservationalConsensus signal: Observational
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.467
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 1.000
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
We have discovered strong gravitational lensing by the galaxy ESO325-G004, in images obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope. The lens galaxy is a boxy group-dominant elliptical at z=0.0345, making this the closest known galaxy-scale lensing system. The lensed object is very blue (B-I = 1.1), and forms two prominent arcs and a less extended third image. The Einstein radius is R_Ein=1.9 kpc (~3 arcsec on the sky, cf. 12 arcsec effective radius of the lens galaxy). Assuming a high redshift for the source, the mass within R_Ein is 1.4x10^11 M_sun, and the I-band mass-to-light ratio is 1.8 (M/L)_sun. The equivalent velocity dispersion is sigma_lens=310 km/s, in excellent agreement with the measured stellar dispersion sigma_v=320 km/s. Modeling the lensing potential with a singular isothermal ellipse (SIE), we find close agreement with the light distribution. The best fit SIE model reproduces the ellipticity of the lens galaxy to ~10%, and its position angle within 1 degree. The model predicts the broad features of the arc geometry as observed; the unlensed magnitude of the source is estimated at I ~ 23.75. We suggest that one in ~200 similarly-massive galaxies within z<0.1 will exhibit such a luminous multiply-imaged source.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Topic
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Field
- Physics and Astronomy
- Canadian institutions
- University of Waterloo
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- PhysicsAstrophysicsVelocity dispersionGalaxyGravitational lensEinstein radiusEinstein ringElliptical galaxyRedshiftPosition angleAstronomyMass distributionStrong gravitational lensingRADIUSLens (geology)Optics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes