MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104230834 · doi:10.1111/jgs.16917

Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Is Efficacious and Safe in Frail Individuals

2020· article· en· W3104230834 on OpenAlexaff
Desmond Curran, Joon H. Kim, Sean Matthews, Christophe Dessart, Myron J. Levin, Lidia Oostvogels, Megan Riley, Kenneth E. Schmader, Anthony L. Cunningham, Shelly McNeil, Anne Schuind, Melissa K. Andrew

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsMedicineReactogenicityRandomized controlled trialConfidence intervalAdverse effectClinical trialPlaceboVaccine efficacyPediatricsImmunogenicityVaccinationInternal medicineImmunologyAlternative medicineAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Frail participants are often under‐represented in randomized trials, raising questions about outcomes of interventions in real‐world settings. Frailty is strongly associated with vulnerability to illness and adverse health outcomes. We studied the impact of frailty on recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) clinical outcomes. DESIGN/SETTING Data from two previously conducted phase III randomized trials of RZV were pooled. These two parent trials were conducted concurrently at the same study sites using the same methods. PARTICIPANTS/INTERVENTION In the two parent studies, participants aged ≥50 years (ZOE‐50 study) and ≥70 years (ZOE‐70 study), respectively, were randomized 1:1 to receive two doses of RZV or placebo. MEASUREMENTS In the current ZOE‐Frailty study (NCT03563183), a frailty index was created using previously validated methods. Clinical outcomes assessed by frailty status included vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety. RESULTS Of 29,305 participants from the pooled ZOE‐50 and ZOE‐70 total vaccinated cohort, 92% were included in this study. Mean age was 68.8 years; 58.1% were women; 45.6% were pre‐frail and 11.3% frail. The percentage of frail participants increased with age from 5.7% aged 50–59 years to 22.7% aged ≥80 years. RZV vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster was >90% for all frailty subgroups (non‐frail: 95.8% (95% confidence interval = 91.6–98.2), pre‐frail: 90.4% (84.4–94.4), frail: 90.2% (75.4–97.0)). The RZV group demonstrated robust anti‐gE antibody and gE‐specific CD4 2+ responses, with mean concentrations remaining above pre‐vaccination levels at least 3 years post‐dose two, in all frailty subgroups. In the RZV group, the percentage of participants reporting solicited adverse events tended to decrease with increasing frailty. CONCLUSION The relatively nonrestrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria in the parent ZOE studies resulted in a range of participants that included frail and pre‐frail older adults. RZV significantly reduced the risk of herpes zoster across all frailty subgroups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietySame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207