MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104376512 · doi:10.1002/dta.2978

Pharmacokinetics of salmeterol and its main metabolite α‐hydroxysalmeterol after acute and chronic dry powder inhalation in exercising endurance‐trained men: Implications for doping control

2020· article· en· W3104376512 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Søren Jessen, Victoria Becker, Sebastian Rzeppa, Vibeke Backer, Kasper Høtoft Bengtsen, Ingunn Hullstein, Yvette Dehnes, Morten Hostrup

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Testing and Analysis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPharmacological Effects and Assays
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorld Anti-Doping Agency
KeywordsSalmeterolPharmacokineticsInhalationMetaboliteMedicineAnesthesiaPharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As of 2020, use of beta 2 ‐agonist salmeterol is restricted by the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA) and is only permitted by inhalation at therapeutic doses not exceeding 200 μg in 24 h. In contrast to beta 2 ‐agonists salbutamol and formoterol, WADA has not established a urine threshold for salmeterol despite its muscle hypertrophic actions observed in animals. Herein, we investigated plasma (0–4 h) and urine (0–24 h) concentrations (by ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry [UHPLC–MS/MS]) of salmeterol and α‐hydroxysalmeterol after dry powder inhalation at supratherapeutic (400 μg) and high therapeutic (200 μg) doses, and after seven consecutive days of therapeutic inhalation (200 μg × day −1 ) in 11 healthy endurance‐trained men. During each trial, participants inhaled salmeterol before 1½ h moderate‐intensity cycling. Mean ± SD maximum urine concentrations of salmeterol unadjusted for specific gravity reached 4.0 ± 1.6, 2.1 ± 1.5, and 2.2 ± 1.1 ng × ml −1 for 400 μg, 200 μg, and seven consecutive days of 200 μg, respectively, with corresponding maximum urine concentrations of α‐hydroxysalmeterol being 11.6 ± 6.1, 5.7 ± 4.6, and 6.5 ± 2.6 ng × ml −1 . Within the relevant window for doping control (first 6 h post‐inhalation), the present data (119 samples), along with 64 biobank urine samples, showed that a combined salmeterol and α‐hydroxysalmeterol urine threshold with equal cut‐offs of 3.3 ng × ml −1 was superior to a salmeterol‐only threshold to discriminate therapeutic (200 μg) from supratherapeutic use (400 μg) with a sensitivity of 24% with 0% false positives when applying the WADA technical document (TD2019DL.v2) method of specific gravity adjustment. Thus, a combination of urine salmeterol and α‐hydroxysalmeterol concentrations may be suitable for discriminating between therapeutic and supratherapeutic prohibited inhalation of salmeterol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrug Testing and AnalysisSame topicPharmacological Effects and AssaysFrench-language works237,207