MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16702: Myocardial Deformation Analysis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Sarcomere Mutations: Insights From 2,221 Patients Within the NHLBI-HCM Registry

2020· article· en· W3104694578 on OpenAlexaff
Bobak Heydari, Alessandro Satriano, James A. White, Naeem Merchant, Masliza Mahmod, Betty Raman, Kenneth Chan, Panagiotis Antiochos, Michael Jerosch‐Herold, Carolyn Y. Ho, William S. Weintraub, Sarahfaye Dolman, Paul Kolm, Nancy L. Geller, Dong‐Yun Kim, Patrice Desvigne‐Nickens, John Dimarco, Milind Y. Desai, Hugh Watkins, Stefan Neubauer, Christopher M. Kramer, Raymond Y. Kwong

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcomereMedicineCardiologyHypertrophic cardiomyopathyInternal medicineContractilityEjection fractionCardiomyopathyEccentricHeart failureMyocyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is caused by mutations in sarcomere genes that alter myocardial contractility and relaxation. Three-dimensional myocardial deformation analysis (3D-MDA) may elucidate left ventricular (LV) abnormalities associated with sarcomere genotype status. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that HCM patients with sarcomere mutations have changes in myocardial contractility profiles that are associated with adverse LV architectural changes. Methods: 3D-MDA was measured using validated feature-tracking software applied to 2D cine cardiac MRI studies in 2,221 genotyped patients within the NHLBI HCM Registry. Results: Baseline, cardiac MRI, and 3D MDA-derived strain characteristics stratified by sarcomere status are shown in Table 1. Sarcomere positive patients were younger, had less LV outflow tract obstruction and lower indexed LV mass, but similar LVEF and trend towards higher serum NT-proBNP levels. Maximal wall thickness, measures of diffuse myocardial fibrosis (native T1, extracellular volume fraction) were elevated with corresponding reduction in global radial strain. Global minimum principal and epicardial layer conventional strain values were higher in sarcomere positive patients. Epicardial minimum principal strain was highly correlated with indexed LV mass (r=0.42, P<0.0001), maximal wall thickness (r=0.29, P<0.0001), LVEF (r=-0.33, P<0.0001), late gadolinium enhancement (r=0.22, P<0.0001) and NT-proBNP (r=0.21, P<0.0001) levels in those with sarcomere mutations. Conclusions: Sarcomere positive HCM patients had differences in myocardial deformation strain profiles that were correlated to LV architectural changes and NT-proBNP levels despite lower indexed LV mass. More sensitive measures of contractile dysfunction may help elucidate pathophysiological mechanisms by which sarcomere mutations cause disease progression and adverse clinical outcomes in HCM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies→French-language works237,207→