MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104861185 · doi:10.17483/2368-6669.1226

Clinical Nurse Instructor Competencies: An Exploratory Study of Role Requirements

2020· article· en· W3104861185 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Natalie A. Bownes, Michelle Freeman

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmière · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumNursingExploratory researchMedical educationNurse educationNurse educatorMedicinePatient carePsychologyPedagogySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Baccalaureate nursing education consists of theoretical and practical training that prepares students for the role of competent nursing care providers. The practical application of knowledge and skills is vital in nursing curricula worldwide. Nursing programs have changed over the last few decades and have become increasingly dependent on part-time Clinical Instructors (CIs) to teach the clinical components of the curricula. However, CIs receive minimal instruction to prepare for this complex role. It has been acknowledged in Canada that there is limited research to inform CI specific competencies. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to conduct an exploratory study to identify the CIs perceptions of the importance of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) nurse educator core competencies and their importance to the clinical teaching role. Methodology: This was an exploratory quantitative study. A self-report survey was developed guided by the WHOs Nurse Educator Core Competencies (NECC). Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome conceptual framework guided this study. Sample and setting: Convenience sampling of participants employed as CIs in a baccalaureate in nursing program in an Ontario university. CIs who taught theory courses were excluded. The survey response rate was 23.9% (n=27). Results: The study results confirm that all the NECC have merit but need to be adapted to a CI-specific role. This is a multi-phased research project and the findings of the study have implications for all stakeholders, including schools of nursing and CIs. Ongoing research is required to inform the policy direction as it pertains to the CI-specific role and competencies in Canada. Implications for nursing programs, research and policy will be shared. Conclusions: Clinical Instruction is an area of nursing which deserves to be acknowledged as a specialty. National standardized CI-specific competencies will provide a strong foundation for CI preparation in Canada. Contexte : Le baccalauréat en sciences infirmières comprend des cours théoriques et pratiques préparant les étudiantes au rôle de professionnelles compétentes en soins de santé. Dans les programmes d’études en sciences infirmières partout dans le monde, l’application pratique des connaissances et habiletés est essentielle. Les programmes de sciences infirmières se sont transformés au cours des dernières décennies, dépendant de plus en plus des enseignantes de clinique (Clinical Instructors; CI), à temps partiel, pour le volet pratique du programme d’études. Ces enseignantes reçoivent toutefois très peu de soutien pour les préparer à jouer ce rôle complexe. Au Canada, il a été reconnu que peu de recherches renseignent sur les compétences

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.542
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmièreSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207