MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3104882427 · doi:10.1109/tap.2020.3037806

Side-Lobe Level Reduction of Half-Mode Substrate Integrated Waveguide Leaky-Wave Antenna

2020· article· en· W3104882427 on OpenAlexafffund
Nima Javanbakht, Rony E. Amaya, J. Shaker, B. Syrett

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTaperingAntenna (radio)Materials scienceSide lobeOpticsAperture (computer memory)Extremely high frequencyMiniaturizationOptoelectronicsReduction (mathematics)Antenna apertureWaveguideDipole antennaAcousticsTelecommunicationsComputer sciencePhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this communication, we introduce a novel design for mitigating the side-lobe level (SLL) of the half-mode substrate integrated waveguide (HMSIW)-based leaky-wave antenna (LWA). Applying a novel approach through modification of the side aperture of HMSIW, we achieved an SLL of -13.8 and -11.2 dB in the upper hemisphere and full space, respectively. The key novelty of this communication is the reduction of SLL in full space while the state-of-the-art antennas only mitigated the SLL in the upper hemisphere. Furthermore, tapering the open side aperture in a thin trapezoid shape led to a significant reduction of beam squint. The operating frequency band of the antenna matches the allocated 5G wireless network millimeter-wave bands from 26 to 30 GHz. The measured peak realized gain of the antenna is 10.6 dBi at 28.5 GHz. The length, width, and height of the HMSIW antenna are 70, 15, and 0.5 mm, respectively. The antenna was fabricated on a Rogers RT/Duroid 5880 substrate. Excellent agreement between the measurements and simulated results was observed. The discrepancies between the measured and simulated results were analyzed by a complete and thorough sensitivity analysis that included the effects of the fabrication tolerances, connectors' misalignment, and bending due to the mechanical stress. High gain, low SLL, and compactness are among the advantages of the proposed antenna making it a suitable candidate for the miniaturization of 5G communication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207