MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3104940473

Finite volume effects using lattice chiral perturbation theory

2004· article· en· W3104940473 on OpenAlexaff
B. Borasoy, Randy Lewis, Daniel Paul Mazur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLattice (music)Finite volume methodChiral perturbation theoryPerturbation (astronomy)Regularization (linguistics)Lattice field theoryStatistical physicsMathematicsPhysicsTheoretical physicsMathematical physicsMechanicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lattice regularization is used to perform chiral perturbation theory calculations in finite volume. The lattice spacing is chosen small enough to be irrelevant, and numerical results are obtained from simple summations. 1. CONTEXT Lattice QCD simulations are necessarily performed in a finite volume though one is typically interested in results for infinite spacetime. The extrapolation introduces a systematic uncertainty which needs to be controlled. As the lightest particle in the QCD spectrum, the pion has a large Compton wavelength and therefore plays a key role in these volume effects, so chiral perturbation theory is the natural tool for studying volume dependences. After the pioneering work of Gasser and Leutwyler[1], there has been a lot of activity on this topic. Some recent studies in the light meson sector can be found in Refs. [2,3,4,5]. Physical results do not depend on regularization scheme. For chiral perturbation theory in a finite volume, lattice regularization is numerically convenient because loop diagrams are finite summations for any nonzero lattice spacing. Divergences would appear as the lattice spacing vanishes, but for the volume effects studied here we can simply use a nonzero lattice spacing which is small enough to be numerically irrelevant. The present work uses the lattice regularized chiral perturbation theory Lagrangian of Ref. [6], but for two flavors rather than three. Extra O(a) terms could be added to the Lagrangian but they are irrelevant in the continuum limit, and our present goal is the computation of finite volume effects for the continuum limit. 2. THE PION MASS Consider an isotropic spacetime lattice with spacing “a”, Ns sites in each spatial direction and Nt sites in the temporal direction. The pion mass is obtained at the one-loop level from the diagrams in Fig. 1. The propagators and vertices are obtained from the Lagrangian of Ref. [6] in a straightforward manner, and loop momenta are summed. The resulting Green’s function is

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→