Distributed Application Global States Monitoring in PEGASUS DA Applied to Parallel Graph Partitioning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary This paper presents how parallel advanced graph partitioning algorithms can be designed and improved with the use of global application states monitoring of distributed programs. The proposed algorithms have been implemented inside a novel distributed program design framework Program Execution Governed by Asynchronous Supervision of States in Distributed Applications (PEGASUS DA). This framework provides system support for the design of execution control in distributed applications based on automated global state monitoring. Two strategies for the control design of advanced parallel/distributed graph partitioning algorithms are presented and discussed. In the first one, the parallel algorithm control runs on top of the popular graph partitioning METIS tool. The second control strategy is based on genetic programming so that partitioning primitives and the overall algorithmic control can be freely designed by the user. Advanced partitioning methods have been conveniently embedded inside the global state monitoring driven PEGASUS DA framework which controls partitioning distributed actions at the level of processes and threads. The use of the framework allowed easy design and testing of different graph optimization strategies. The presented graph partitioning methods are illustrated by experiments with benchmark graphs. The experiments have comparatively assessed the obtained graph partitioning quality (visible improvement has been observed) and have identified benefits of the proposed approach for programmers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".