Formation of the Rational Socio-Economic Worldview Based on the Laws of Nature and Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study is aimed at the improvement of social and economic relations based on modern directions of the formation of a rational socio-economic worldview, eliminating the sociological contradictions of modern society. The use of a system-holistic interdisciplinary methodology determines the need to review the development tools of the problem of creating a rational worldview in society. The basis of the research methodology has become the conceptual matrix of the formation of a rational worldview according to community levels, taking into account the basic socio-economic law of human development in any system. The article presents the results of a study designed as a clarification of the concept of “rational worldview”, creating a list of the benefits of forming a rational socio-economic worldview based on the laws of nature and society, and determining the directions of formation of a rational worldview in the context of the topic under study. The results of the study can be used in the system of state management of economic processes. Novelty/Originality of this study: (1) actualized, based on the systematization of scientific views, the theoretical provisions of the formation of a rational socio-economic worldview and determined the modern directions of its development; (2) the analysis of modern practices of the life of modern society is carried out and the logical and ideological contradictions in the field of behavioral economics are highlighted; (3) the conceptual apparatus of the category “rational worldview” has been clarified in the context of the contradictions in the functioning of socio-economic systems; (4) a conceptual matrix for the formation of a rational worldview has been developed; (5) the advantages of the formation of a rational worldview among the subjects of the development of society are formulated, based on social criteria analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".