Humic acid may retard damages of cells in strawberry apices in high saline environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most studies were focused on the salt-resistance physiology by humic acid (HA) for strawberry in the past. For advancely verifying the remission of salt injury by humic acid, this study was conducted to evaluate K+/Na+ in the strawberry and observe cell morphology of strawberry after treatment of salt concentrations (0 and 50 mg kg-1) and HA (0, 150 and 300 mg kg-1). The results showed that the treatments of humic acid will increase the absorption of K+ (potassium ion) and reduce Na+ (sodium ion), and hence increase K+/Na+ in the root and leaf of strawberry. By the observing of SEM (scanning electron microscopy) and TEM (transmission electron microscopy), under no salt treatments, no matter the additive concentration of humic acid, the root apices of strawberries were normal and integrity. However, in the treatments of high salt concentration, the shrinking and cracking of cells in root apices of strawberries were serious and gradually getting integrity and normal after adding humic acids from 150 to 300 mg kg-1. These results showed that the appropriate treating concentration of humic acid will inhibit the salt injury on root apices of strawberries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".