Impact of feed restriction, chloroquine and deoxynivalenol on viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus IVb in fathead minnow <i>Pimephales promelas</i> Rafinesque
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Autophagy can markedly alter host response to infectious disease, and several studies have demonstrated that a restricted diet or deoxynivalenol modulates autophagy and reduces mortality of fish due to bacterial disease. The picture is less clear for viral diseases of fish. Duplicate tanks of fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas Rafinesque, were fed a replete diet (control), 100 µM chloroquine, 5 µM deoxynivalenol, 10% (fasted) or 40% of a replete diet (pair‐fed) for 2 weeks and then experimentally infected by intraperitoneal injection with 2 × 10 5 viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus IVb. Survival from highest to lowest for the different treatments was as follows: deoxynivalenol (average 43.3%); control (40.0%); pair‐fed (35.0%); fasted (33.3%); and chloroquine (21.7%). No treatment significantly altered the survival rate of fathead minnow after VHSV IVb infection when compared to controls; however, the fish fed with chloroquine had significantly lower survival rate than the fish fed deoxynivalenol ( p < .05).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".