Alteration of Coagulation Test Results and Vaginal Bleeding Associated With the Use of Feverfew (<i>Tanacetum parthenium</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tanacetum parthenium (feverfew) is a member of the daisy family; it is used to prevent and treat migraine and rheumatoid arthritis. It has a long history of use as a traditional and folk medicine in Chinese, Greek, Indian and Arabic medicine, having been used for hundreds of years. The term feverfew comes from the Latin word febrifugia and means fever reducer. However, Short term use of feverfew (up to 4 months) is considered safe in adults. According to a few clinical trials, Tanacetum parthenium was not associated with serious adverse events but rather with mild and reversible events. Adverse events leading to withdrawals were mainly of a gastrointestinal nature. There is no major safety issue. Nevertheless, we report one case of a 36-year-old woman with known migraine who visited the obstetrics and gynecology clinic upon developing vaginal bleeding, prolonged duration of the menstrual cycle, and reddish skin without bruising. The patient suffered from these symptoms over a period of 3 months prior to the clinic visit. Based on history, the patient began taking 800 mg capsules of feverfew three times per day 9 months ago. We applied the Naranjo scale in our case, and it indicated that a probable relationship exists between feverfew and vaginal bleeding. Feverfew should be used cautiously by patients planning elective surgery, having coagulant disorders or taking antithrombotic drugs. J Med Cases. 2021;12(1):9-12 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3601
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".