MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perbandingan Ketepatan antara Pemeriksaan Sitologi Sputum Induksi NaCl 3% dengan Sitologi Sputum Post‐ Bronkoskopi secara Fiksasi Saccomanno dalam Membantu Penegakan Diagnosis Kanker Paru

2011· article· en· W31054922 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Irena Lolu Putriya Sinaga

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSputumMedicineTuberculosisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Potato virus M (PVM), which is a member of the genus Carlavirus in the family Betaflexviridae, causes critical economic losses of nightshade crops. PVM is transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent manner, by sap inoculation and also transmitted in tubers. Previously, several reports described the genetic structure of PVM. However, the evolutionary rate, timescale, spread and adaptation evolution of the virus have not been examined. In this study, we investigated the phylodynamics of PVM using 145 nucleotide sequences of the coat protein gene and 117 sequences of the cysteine-rich nucleic acid-binding protein (NABP) gene, which were sampled between 1985 and 2013. We found that at least three lineages with isolates that were defined geographically but not by the original host were clustered. The evolutionary rate of the NABP (1.06 × 10<sup>-2</sup>) was faster than that of the CP (4.12 × 10<sup>-3</sup>). The time to the most recent common ancestors (TMRCAs) is similar between CP (CIs 31-110) and NABP (CIs 28-33) genes. Based on CP and NABP genes, PVM migrated from China to Canada, Iran, India and European countries, and it circulated within China. Our study is the first attempt to evaluate the evolutionary rates, timescales and migration dynamics of PVM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207