MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3105618591 · doi:10.1161/circ.142.suppl_4.332

Abstract 332: Long-term Post-discharge Survival and Healthcare Utilization Following Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Insights From a Novel Province-wide Linkage

2020· article· en· W3105618591 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher B. Fordyce, Brian Grunau, Meijiao Guan, May K. Lee, Nathaniel M. Hawkins, Jennie Helmer, Graham C. Wong, Karin H. Humphries, Jim Christenson

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsIsland HealthCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency medicineConventional PCIProportional hazards modelHospital dischargeCardiopulmonary resuscitationInternal medicineCardiologyResuscitationMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with poor short-term outcomes. However, the impact of pre- and in-hospital factors on long-term outcomes is ill-defined, mainly related to challenges combining disparate data sources. Methods: We linked adult non-traumatic EMS-treated OHCAs from the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest Registry (Jan 2009 - Dec 2016) to provincial datasets describing co-morbidities, medications, procedures, mortality, and hospital admission and discharge. Among hospital-discharge survivors, we examined the 3-year composite endpoint of mortality ± all-cause readmission using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and multivariable Cox model for predictors. Results: Of 10,876 successfully linked OHCAs, 1325 survived to hospital discharge: mean age 62.8 years, 77.9% male, 72.6% shockable rhythms, 60.1% non-public locations, 69.1% bystander CPR, and 30.3% STEMI. During admission, 78.6% required mechanical ventilation, 69.1% received coronary angiography (37.5% PCI, 10.3% CABG), and 24.8% received an ICD. At 3 years post-discharge, the estimated KM event rates were 15.9% (95% CI 13.9%, 19.3%) for mortality and 68.2% (95% CI 65.3%, 71.0%) for mortality and readmission, which differed by age, initial rhythm, and arrest location ( Figure ). Following multivariable analysis, patients with a history of HF [HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.34 - 1.96)], age >75 [1.62 (1.35, 1.96)], anticoagulation use [2.55 (1.36, 4.79)], non-shockable rhythm [1.29 (1.07, 1.55)] and non-public arrest location [1.21(1.04, 1.40)] were more likely to experience the composite endpoint; those receiving coronary angiography were less likely [0.79 (0.64, 0.98)]. Conclusions: The long-term death or readmission risk persists even among OHCA hospital-discharge survivors, and is associated with both pre- and in-hospital factors. An enriched, linked dataset detailing the entire OHCA “journey” may be a promising tool to identify care and treatment gaps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→