Lessons of the month: A breathless severe asthmatic in the genomic era: Occam's razor or Hickam's dictum?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Breathlessness is a subjective symptom that may stem from a number of pathological and functional aetiologies. Consequently, clinicians are often faced with the challenge of navigating between the tensions of Occam's razor (parsimonious aetiology) or Hickam's dictum (multiple diagnoses). We report a case of a 36-year-old woman with a lifelong history of episodic breathlessness caused at various times by dysfunctions of lung parenchyma (emphysema) and airway smooth muscle (asthma), skeletal muscle (filamin-C fibrillary myopathy) and cardiac muscle (cardiomyopathy). We illustrate the utility of the modern diagnostic toolbox in the assessment, understanding and management of complex dyspnoea (including the use of inflammometry, inhaled-gas magnetic resonance imaging-guided bronchial thermoplasty, and genetic testing), and also demonstrate the importance of interdisciplinary data interpretation in establishing accurate aetiologic diagnoses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".