d-Orbital steered active sites through ligand editing on heterometal imidazole frameworks for rechargeable zinc-air battery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The implementation of pristine metal-organic frameworks as air electrode may spark fresh vitality to rechargeable zinc-air batteries, but successful employment is rare due to the challenges in regulating their electronic states and structural porosity. Here we conquer these issues by incorporating ligand vacancies and hierarchical pores into cobalt-zinc heterometal imidazole frameworks. Systematic characterization and theoretical modeling disclose that the ligand editing eases surmountable energy barrier for *OH deprotonation by its efficacy to steer metal d -orbital electron occupancy. As a stride forward, the selected cobalt-zinc heterometallic alliance lifts the energy level of unsaturated d -orbitals and optimizes their adsorption/desorption process with oxygenated intermediates. With these merits, cobalt-zinc heterometal imidazole frameworks, as a conceptually unique electrode, empowers zinc-air battery with a discharge-charge voltage gap of 0.8 V and a cyclability of 1250 h at 15 mA cm –2 , outperforming the noble-metal benchmarks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".