MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3105762847 · doi:10.1136/leader-2020-fmlm.68

68 A quality improvement project to enhance the recovery pathway following elective caesarean section at St Thomas’ Hospital

2020· article· en· W3105762847 on OpenAlexaff
Charlotte Harvey, Masud Awil, Omar Abdul Jolil, Roxanne Sutthakorn, Yanjinlkham Chuluunbaatar

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPDCAMedicinePsychological interventionMedical prescriptionCaesarean sectionPharmacyIntervention (counseling)Quality managementEmergency medicinePregnancyFamily medicineNursingOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims Our project aimed to enhance the recovery pathway for elective caesarean section (ELCS) at St Thomas’ Hospital by reducing the length of stay by 20% by February 2020 (over a course of 5 months). Methods Quantitative and qualitative data (via feedback forms) was sought. The length of stay following ELCS was calculated from theatre operating times and discharge time obtained via BadgerNet. The baseline data was collected for 4 weeks in September 2019 and the project ran until February 2020. ELCS journeys were shadowed, gaining exposure to patient and staff experiences. This revealed that the ‘to take out medication’ (TTO) pathway was a major contributor to discharge delays and therefore interventions were devised forming three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. The first intervention and PDSA cycle consisted of poster and email reminders for junior doctors to increase TTO prescription efficiency. The second saw maternity support workers (MSWs) collect TTO medication from the central pharmacy twice daily at 2:30pm and 4:30pm. An additional collection time of 6pm was added for the third and final intervention. Results The baseline median length of stay of 51.2 hours decreased to 47.4 hours after all interventions. We did not reach our goal of less than 41 hours (20% reduction from baseline). The results, however, are very promising with 59.8% of patients (137 of 229 patients) staying a duration less than our baseline median hours of 51.2. Conclusions Our activities altered the logistics of TTO delivery leading to earlier discharge and are easily reproducible and could be beneficial throughout the hospital setting. The benefits include more positive experiences for women, improved recovery, reduced departmental costs and bed demands. Identifying problems and collating feedback from stakeholders was essential to our success and should be undertaken by those in management before making changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts→Same topicClinical practice guidelines implementation→French-language works237,207→