MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3105953946 · doi:10.1021/acsami.0c13881

Direct Synthesis of Atomically Dispersed Palladium Atoms Supported on Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Efficient Selective Hydrogenation Reactions

2020· article· en· W3105953946 on OpenAlexaff
Fenglian Hu, Leipeng Leng, Mingyang Zhang, Wenxing Chen, Yanlong Yu, Jun Wang, J. Hugh Horton, Zhijun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicNanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersHeilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science FoundationNortheast Petroleum UniversityChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMaterials scienceGraphitic carbon nitridePalladiumCatalysisCarbon nitrideCarbon fibersNitrideNanotechnologyChemical engineeringComposite numberPhotocatalysisOrganic chemistryLayer (electronics)Composite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterogeneous catalysts with atomically precise metal sites have enabled unique insight into structure–property relationships in materials science. Herein, we report the construction and selective hydrogenation performance of a single-atom palladium catalyst by confining the palladium atoms into the six-fold N-coordinating cavities of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) through a facile spatial confinement-reduction approach under mild reducing conditions. Spherical aberration correction electron microscopy and extended X-ray absorption fine structure measurements confirm the presence of atomically dispersed palladium atoms stabilized by the g-C3N4 support. Its exceptional catalytic activity was demonstrated by the hydrogenation of styrene (98% conversion, 1.5 h) and furfural (conversion of 64% and selectivity of 99%, 4 h) and hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol (99% conversion and 99% selectivity, 10 min). This palladium catalyst can be reused at least five times with negligible deterioration of its activity. Importantly, the palladium atoms retained their atomic dispersion following the thermal treatment. Moreover, this synthetic method can be scaled up while retaining similar catalytic activity. Fundamental insights are provided to elucidate how the material’s structure significantly impacts the catalytic performance at the atomic scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsFrench-language works237,207