MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106011788 · doi:10.22225/jkh.2.1.2534.426-430

Hubungan Fungsional Desa Pakraman dengan Desa Dinas dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan di Desa Pererenan Menurut UU No. 6 Tahun 2014

2020· article· en· W3106011788 on OpenAlexaff
I Made Restu Putra, I Wayan Arthanaya, Luh Putu Suryani

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Konstruksi Hukum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionGovernment (linguistics)Public administrationPolitical scienceIndonesianNormativeLocal governmentLawEconomic growthGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesian Constitution No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages stipulates that a village refers to official village and traditional villages, but hereinafter referred to as village. This implies that there is a village government organizer. If this provision is applied in Bali, however, it will trigger an indication of the blurring of norms since in Bali there are two types of villages, namely Desa Pakraman (customary village) and official village, and the same is true in Desa Pererenan. The official village carries out the function of administering government administration and the Desa Pakraman (customary village) carries out the function of administering customary and religious affairs. The dualism of governance in villages in Bali, including in Pererenan Village, in the implementation of village development, can cause problems, because each village has autonomous rights in carrying out government functions. Therefore, this study highlights two things, namely how the development is planned in Desa Pererenan and the functional relationship between the Desa Pakraman and the official village in the implementation of development. The method used to examine these two issues is the normative research method, which involves qualitatively analyzed documents, both official and in the form of notes, laws and regulations and related government regulations. The research conclusions are drawn deductively. Based on the results of data analysis, it can is revealed that the development planning process (physical and non-physical) in Desa Pererenan refers to the Badung Regency development planning pattern, such as the National Plan of Development Plan (PPNSB), which adopts the philosophy of life and local wisdom of the Balinese people. Village development planning involves the Village Consultative Body (BPD) and the community in a participatory manner, is compiled in a periodic manner, and includes the Village Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJM) for a period of 6 (six) years and the Village Government Work Plan (RKP) for a period of 1 ( one year). The relationship between the desa pakraman and the official village in Pererenan Village is functional, namely consultative and coordinative, which is the working relationship between the prajuru desa pakraman (head of desa pakraman) and the official or perbekel village head. The duties and authorities of the two villages have differences but are still interrelated with one another.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Konstruksi HukumSame topicLocal Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207