Stability of Reconstituted Fibrinogen Concentrate in Hemostatic Function and Concentration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Canadian Armed Forces adopted fibrinogen concentrate (RiaSTAP) for hemostatic resuscitation in the far-forward combat setting, given its potential benefits of reducing blood loss, blood transfusion and mortality, and its long storage stability and high portability. The current guidance recommends that RiaSTAP should be administered within 8 hours after reconstitution when stored at room temperature. However, little information about its stability is available. There is also a need to investigate the stability and efficacy of RiaSTAP after reconstitution and exposure to extreme temperatures in which our forces may operate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RiaSTAP was reconstituted as per manufacturer's instruction and stored at specific temperatures (-20°C, 4°C, 22°C, 35°C, 42°C, or 50°C) for up to 6 months. Reconstituted RiaSTAP was also oscillated on a rocker at 18 rpm under 22°C and 50°C. Its hemostatic function was measured using rotational thromboelastometry performed with RiaSTAP-spiked whole blood. Fibrinogen concentrations were measured by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Gel electrophoresis was also conducted for initial and stored samples. RESULTS: We found no change to the hemostatic function of reconstituted RiaSTAP after storage at -20°C for 6 months. At 4°C, no obvious changes to the hemostatic effect of reconstituted RiaSTAP relative to 0 hours were seen until 1,680 hours. At 22°C, a remarkable decrease began after storage for 168 hours. Storage at 35°C significantly decreased the hemostatic effect after 144 hours, while the storage at 42°C resulted in decreased hemostatic function after 72 hours. Finally, storage at 50°C for 8 hours resulted in complete loss of hemostatic function. Compared to the hemostatic activity, the fibrinogen concentration for reconstituted RiaSTAP showed less change over time. No apparent decline in fibrinogen concentration was seen after storage at -20°C for 6 months and at 4°C for 1,680 hours. At 22°C, there were no clear alterations until 792 hours. There was a decline in fibrinogen concentration at 35°C and 42°C after 672 and 600 hours of storage, respectively. At 50°C, little amount of fibrinogen was detected by ELISA at 8 hours. Similar changes in the hemostatic effect and fibrinogen concentration over time were observed under the rocking condition in comparison with the static condition at the same temperature. The gel electrophoresis confirmed fibrinogen degradation which increased with storage temperature and time. CONCLUSIONS: The stability of reconstituted RiaSTAP decreases with increasing storage temperature. The hemostatic function deteriorated before fibrinogen concentration and integrity were significantly altered at all temperatures for the study period except at 50°C where there was a rapid decline in both hemostatic function and fibrinogen concentration. Sample oscillation did not significantly affect its stability. The shelf life of reconstituted RiaSTAP may, therefore, be recommended accordingly when stored at different temperatures and extended to 6 days at room temperature provided that sterility is maintained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".