MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106350165

[no title]

2020· article· en· W3106350165 on OpenAlexfundno aff
F. L. Rommel, F. Braga-Ribas, J. Desmars, J. I. B. Camargo, J. L. Ortiz, B. Sicardy, R. Vieira-Martins, M. Assafin, P. Santos-Sanz, R. Duffárd, E. Fernández-Valenzuela, J. Lecacheux, B. E. Morgado, G. Benedetti-Rossi, A. R. Gomes-Júnior, C. L. Pereira, D. Herald, W. Hanna, J. Bradshaw, N. Morales, J. Brimacombe, A. Burtovoi, Tom Carruthers, Josiane Rodrigues de Barros, Michele Fiori, A. C. Gilmore, Dan Hooper, K. Hornoch, C. Jacques, T. Janik, S. Kerr, P. M. Kilmartin, Jan Maarten Winkel, G. Naletto, D. Nardiello, V. Nascimbeni, J. Newman, A. Ossola, András Pál, E. Pimentel, Petr Pravec, S. Sposetti, Ariel Stechina, Róbert Szakáts, Yuji Ueno, L. Zampieri, J. Broughton, J. B. Dunham, David Dunham, David Arellano Gault, Tsutomu Hayamizu, K. Hosoi, Emmanuël Jehin, Lynne Jones, K. Kitazaki, R. Komžík, A. Marciniak, A. Maury, H. Mikuž, P. Nosworthy, Joaquín Fabrega Polleri, S. Rahvar, Rafael Sfair, P. B. Siqueira, C. Snodgrass, P. Sogorb, H. Tomioka, J. Tregloan-Reed, O. C. Winter

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorEuropean Space AgencyCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsAstrometryEphemerisTrans-Neptunian objectPhysicsOccultationAstronomyCentaurSolar SystemReference frameChord (peer-to-peer)Photometry (optics)AstrophysicsStarsFrame (networking)Computer scienceSatellite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) and Centaurs are remnants of our planetary system formation, and their physical properties have invaluable information for evolutionary theories. Stellar occultation is a ground-based method for studying these small bodies and has presented exciting results. These observations can provide precise profiles of the involved body, allowing an accurate determination of its size and shape. The goal is to show that even single-chord detections of TNOs allow us to measure their milliarcsecond astrometric positions in the reference frame of the Gaia second data release (DR2). Accurated ephemerides can then be generated, allowing predictions of stellar occultations with much higher reliability. We analyzed data from stellar occultations to obtain astrometric positions of the involved bodies. The events published before the Gaia era were updated so that the Gaia DR2 catalog is the reference. Previously determined sizes were used to calculate the position of the object center and its corresponding error with respect to the detected chord and the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) propagated Gaia DR2 star position. We derive 37 precise astrometric positions for 19 TNOs and 4 Centaurs. Twenty-one of these events are presented here for the first time. Although about 68\% of our results are based on single-chord detection, most have intrinsic precision at the submilliarcsecond level. Lower limits on the diameter and shape constraints for a few bodies are also presented as valuable byproducts. Using the Gaia DR2 catalog, we show that even a single detection of a stellar occultation allows improving the object ephemeris significantly, which in turn enables predicting a future stellar occultation with high accuracy. Observational campaigns can be efficiently organized with this help, and may provide a full physical characterization of the involved object.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.008
Open science0.0120.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences)Same topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207