MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 12896: Safety of Transition From Tafamidis Meglumine 20 Mg to Tafamidis Free Acid 61 Mg in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

2020· article· en· W3106430486 on OpenAlexaff
Thibaud Damy, Nowell M. Fine, Balarama Gundapaneni, Marla B. Sultan, Martha Grogan

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboAdverse effectInternal medicineMeglumineClinical endpointPharmacologyClinical trialPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Tafamidis meglumine, available as 20 mg capsules, is approved in >40 countries for use in early stage, symptomatic transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. It is also approved in a growing number of countries as an 80 mg daily dose (4 x 20 mg capsules) and as tafamidis free acid 61 mg (a single dose bioequivalent to tafamidis meglumine 80 mg) for the treatment of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). As some patients receiving tafamidis meglumine 20 mg may benefit from transition to tafamidis free acid 61 mg, we assessed the hypothesis that this transition is not associated with any new safety concerns. Methods: In the Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) patients with ATTR-CM were treated with tafamidis meglumine 20 mg, 80 mg, or placebo for up to 30 months. Patients completing the trial could enroll in a long-term extension study (LTE) with placebo-treated patients randomized to tafamidis meglumine 20 mg or 80 mg. All patients in the LTE were later transitioned to tafamidis free acid 61 mg. Adverse events (AEs) emerging during the LTE were assessed in patients treated with tafamidis meglumine 20 mg in the LTE who transitioned to tafamidis free acid 61 mg (median exposure 19.8 months). AEs were compared with those emerging during ATTR-ACT in patients treated with tafamidis meglumine 20 mg (median exposure 29.7 months). Results: The 87 patients treated with tafamidis meglumine 20 mg in the LTE who transitioned to tafamidis free acid 61 mg had a similar incidence of the most common AEs by system organ class, and of specific AEs, as those treated with tafamidis meglumine 20 mg in ATTR-ACT (see Table ). The safety profile of tafamidis meglumine 20 mg was previously shown to be similar to placebo. Conclusions: While the duration of exposure to tafamidis free acid 61 mg was shorter than for tafamidis meglumine 20 mg, these data demonstrate that the transition to tafamidis free acid 61 mg is not associated with any new safety concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207