MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Affective disorders on the
background of hypothyroidism.

2018· article· en· W3106473687 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А. V. Budnevskiy, В. А. Куташов, Денис Николаевич Припутневич, A. Ya. Kravchenko, Анна Александровна Феськова

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Medicine (Russian Journal) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuthyroidInternal medicineDepression (economics)AlexithymiaEndocrinologyMedicinePsychopathologyToronto Alexithymia ScaleAdrenocorticotropic hormoneAnxietyHamilton Rating Scale for DepressionDexamethasone suppression testThyroid-stimulating hormoneProlactinThyroidGastroenterologyHormonePsychologyMajor depressive disorderPsychiatryDexamethasone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Affective disorders are the most common psychopathological symptoms of hypothyroidism. Hypothyroidism greatly reduces the effectiveness of antidepressants and replacement L-thyroxine therapy is not enough to eliminate the anxiety and depressive disorders in hypothyroidism. Aim. The purpose of the research is study of psychosomatic and somatopsychical relationships in hypothyroidism and depression. Material and methods. Four hundred and six patients (78 men and 328 women) with affective disorders aged 51,3 ± 4,7 years were examined. The concentration of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroxine (T4), cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) in the blood, urinary excretion of norepinephrine and epinephrine was determined. Severity of depression was estimated by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), alexithymia level - by the Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS-26). Results. In euthyroid patients TSH level was 2,7 ± 0,13 mU/l, in hypothyroid - 14,1 ± 1,21 mU / l (p<0.001), T4 level was 14,4 ± 1,36 and 7.1±1.16 pmol/l, respectively (p<0.001). Depressive disorders were revealed in 374 patients (92.1%), other affective disorders - in 32 patients (7.9%). Hypothyroid patients had more pronounced depression by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and a higher average score by TAS-26 as compared to euthyroid patients (17,8 ± 2,1 vs 15,3 ± 1,9 points, p=0.001and 79,9 ± 4,6 vs. 71,1 ± 4,4 points; p<0.001 respectively). TSH level has a direct correlation with severity of depression (R=0,62; р<0,001). Severe depression was observed in hypothyroid patients more often than in euthyroid patients (9.5% vs. 5.0%; р=0,029). Patients with affective disorders and hypothyroidism have a higher cortisol level and lower ACTH level than euthyroid patients (503±12.1 vs. 420±10.9 nmol/l; р<0.001 and 12.9±3.07 vs. 15.3±3.4; р<0.001 respectively). Urinary excretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine in hypothyroid patients was higher than that in euthyroid patients: 37,8 ± 2,18 vs. 31,1 ± 2,06 nmol (p<0.001) and 39,2 ± 2,14 vs. 33,4 ± 2,1 nmol (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusions. Prevalence of hypothyroidism among patients with affective disorders is higher than in the general population. The severity of the depression has a direct correlation with TSH. Activity of the sympathetic division of the autonomic nervous system is higher in patients with hypothyroidism than in patients with euthyroidism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Medicine (Russian Journal)Same topicHuman Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207