Twelve Cases of Hb Manitoba [α102(G9)Ser→Arg]: the Fluctuation in the Variant Expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hb Manitoba [α102(G9)Ser→Arg] is a rare α chain variant with diverse ethnic origins. It is mildly unstable with an expression of around 10.0–14.2% in the heterozygous state in most literature. In this study, 12 cases of Hb Manitoba [11 cases carried Hb Manitoba II (HBA1: c.309C>A) and one case carried Hb Manitoba IV (HBA1: c.307A>C)] were detected during a wide-spectrum study of α chain variants in the UK. Fluctuation in variant expression from 6.9 to 15.2% of total Hb on high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) would pose a diagnostic dilemma in routine laboratories. Focusing on the variant expression, the median of Hb Manitoba was around 11.5% of total Hb in three cases, apparently with normal hemoglobin (Hb), and normal red blood cell (RBC) indices. Two cases showed a higher expression (13.9 and 15.2%) and five cases showed a lower expression (6.9–9.9%). The common α-thalassemia (α-thal) –α3.7 (rightward) deletion coexisted with one case of increased Hb Manitoba expression. Iron (or other nutrient) deficiency was likely the cause of decreased Hb Manitoba percentage in this study. The α73(EF2)Val→Val (α2) (HBA2: c.222G>T) polymorphism is published for the first time and coexisted with two cases. The Cap +14 (C>G) (HBA2: c.-24C>G) polymorphism coexisted with another case in a heterozygous state. In conclusion, the fluctuation in variant expression can cause a diagnostic dilemma, especially in routine laboratories. Screening for the common –α3.7 deletion and iron deficiency is recommended when an α chain variant is suspected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".