MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3106706560 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11522

Telltale Gait: The Role of Nonverbal Cues in Perceptions of Personality and Vulnerability

2016· dissertation· en· W3106706560 on OpenAlexaff
Mary B. Ritchie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPersonalityVulnerability (computing)PsychopathyPerceptionBig Five personality traitsDevelopmental psychologyCognitionNonverbal communicationSocial psychologyComputer securityPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-verbal behaviour often provides one of the first opportunities to make socially relevant judgments.For example, gait has been shown to inadvertently signal information about personality and vulnerability.Although non-verbal cues such as gait appear to signal socially relevant information, researchers have identified distinct differences in the ability of observers to accurately perceive these cues.Based on this research, Study 1 examined the personalities and victimization histories of walkers in relation to their gait, and Study 2 explored individual differences in observer's perceptions of the walkers' personality and vulnerability.While victimization history was associated with the display of vulnerable gait cues in Study 1, this association was dependent on victimization type and the cognitive state of the walker.That is, when the walkers felt comfortable, those who had exclusively experienced sexual victimization displayed significantly more vulnerable gait cues than non-victims, while walkers who had exclusively experienced violent victimization did not.Conversely, when the walkers felt uncomfortable, no associations were identified between gait and victimization history.Further, no associations were identified between gait and personality.In Study 2, psychopathy was identified as the most salient predictor of accuracy in perceiving vulnerability to victimization.This association was also dependent on victimization type, where observers higher on psychopathy were significantly more accurate in perceiving vulnerability to violent, but not sexual victimization.While observers were not able to accurately perceive the walkers' personalities, there was a general tendency to view sexual victims as passive, while violent and non-victims were viewed as charismatic.Taken together, the results of the current study raise questions about the role gait plays in perceptions of vulnerability and personality among psychopathic observers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending→French-language works237,207→