The role of concern for error in the relationship between implicit intelligence theory and the perceived competency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little is known about how implicit theories of intelligence and perceived competence are related. This study examines whether concern over mistakes mediates this relationship. A total of 508 students (255 girls) in grade 4 or 5 completed self-reported surveys for four consecutive years. Each year, the results of the mediation analysis indicate that students who perceive their intelligence as more malleable have a stronger sense of competence (r = .25 to .32, p < .001), while the more concerned they are over mistakes, the lower their perceived competence (r = -.18 to -.26, p < .001). At each time of measurement, the concern over mistakes weakens the relationship between the conception of intelligence and perceived competence, which remains significant and moderate, but the role of concern over mistakes tends to fade over time. Keywords: intelligence theory, mistake preoccupation, perception of competence, mediation analysis, elementary and high school education La relation entre la théorie implicite de l'intelligence et la perception de compétence reste peu connue. Cette étude examine le rôle potentiellement médiateur de la préoccupation envers l'erreur dans cette relation. Les 508 élèves participants (255 filles) de 4e année ou 5e année du primaire au début de l'étude ont répondu aux questionnaires pendant quatre ans consécutifs. Les résultats des analyses de médiation faites tous les ans indiquent que plus les élèves ont une conception dynamique de l’intelligence, plus leur perception de compétence est élevée (r = .25 à .32, p < .001) alors que plus ils sont préoccupés par l’erreur, moins leur perception de compétence est élevée (r = -.18 à -.26, p < .001). À chaque temps de mesure, la préoccupation envers l'erreur diminue significativement le lien entre la conception de l'intelligence et la perception de compétence, mais ce dernier reste significatif et modéré. Mots-clés : théorie de l'intelligence, préoccupation envers l’erreur, perception de compétence, analyse de médiation, enseignement primaire et secondaire
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".