Diagnosing Fuel Pumps, Power Transducers, CTs, and PTs via Fuel-Power Function and 2oo3 Voting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In power system operation, the actual operating cost of thermal generating units can be estimated by employing what is called a fuel-cost function. This function can be expressed as a linear, quadratic, or cubic equation. The unit operating cost is the dependent variable, while the independent variable can be the active or reactive power generated by that unit. The mathematical expression of this fuel-cost function is modeled by fitting a curve to match the actual unit readings. In regression analysis, it is known that if there is a relation between two variables, a transposed relation can also be created by making the predictor the subject of the formula instead of the response. In other words, the independent variable is taken as a dependent variable. This study aims to benefit from the fuel-cost function in estimating the unit power output. This means that a fuel-power function can be designed from the fuel-cost function. To validate this claim, a numerical experiment is carried out based on data collected from a real gas turbine (GT). A novel diagnosing system is proposed to check the status of fuel pumps, power transducers, current transformers, and potential transformers by merging the areas of power system automation, control, operation, and protection through a 2 out of 3 (2oo3) voting logic system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".