MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106909291 · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78023-9

Comparison of pre- and postoperative myocardial injuries on mortality after non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis using an inverse probability weighting adjustment

2020· article· en· W3106909291 on OpenAlexaff
Seung Hwa Lee, Jungchan Park, Jong‐Hwan Lee, Jeong Jin Min, Kwan Young Hong, Hyojin Cho, Keumhee C. Carrière, Joonghyun Ahn

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionHazard ratioCardiac surgeryCardiologyConfidence intervalInternal medicineTroponinTroponin TSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although both pre- and postoperative myocardial injuries are strongly associated with an increased postoperative mortality, no study has directly compared the effects of pre- and postoperative myocardial injuries on 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the effects of pre- and postoperative myocardial injury on 30-day mortality after non-cardiac surgery. From January 2010 to December 2016, patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery were stratified into either the normal (n = 3182), preoperative myocardial injury (n = 694), or postoperative myocardial injury (n = 756) groups according to the peak cardiac troponin value. Myocardial injury was defined as a sole elevation of cardiac troponin value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit without ischemic symptom using the 4th universal definition of myocardial infarction. Patients in the preoperative myocardial injury group were further divided into the attenuated (n = 177) or persistent myocardial injury group (n = 517) according to the normalization of cardiac troponin level in postoperative period. As the primary outcome, postoperative 30-day mortalities were compared among the groups using the weighted Cox proportional-hazards regression models with the inverse probability weighting. Compared with the normal group, postoperative 30-day mortality was increased significantly both in the pre- and postoperative myocardial injury groups (1.4% vs. 10.7%; hazard ratio [HR] 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-6.01; p = 0.001 and 1.4% vs. 7.4%; HR 4.49; 95% CI 2.34-8.60; p < 0.001, respectively), however, there was no difference between the pre- and postoperative myocardial injury groups (HR, 1.44; 95% CI 0.79-2.64; p = 0.45). In addition, the attenuated myocardial injury group showed a significantly lower postoperative 30-day mortality than the persistent myocardial injury group (5.6% vs. 12.4%; HR 2.23; 95% CI 1.17-4.44; p = 0.02). In patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, preoperative myocardial injury also increased postoperative 30-day mortality to a similar degree of postoperative myocardial injury. Further studies on the importance of preoperative myocardial injury are needed.Clinical trial number and registry URL: KCT0004348 ( www.cris.nih.go.kr ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207