MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3106987124

An Interface Capturing Procedure for Simulating Incompressible Two-Phase Flows on Adaptive Unstructured Grids

2020· preprint· en· W3106987124 on OpenAlexaff
Romain Janodet, Vincent Moureau, Renaud Mercier, Ghislain Lartigue, Pierre Bénard, Thibaut Ménard, A. Berlemont

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnstructured gridComputer scienceSolverSigned distance functionTangentFinite volume methodMesh generationInterface (matter)Computational scienceCurvatureProjection methodCompressibilityContext (archaeology)Adaptive mesh refinementAlgorithmMathematical optimizationGeometryGridMechanicsMathematicsFinite element methodParallel computingPhysicsDykstra's projection algorithmGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To design many industrial systems, accurate and efficient simulations of complex two-phase flows are required. In this context, handling complex geometries becomes necessary. The use of unstructured grids fulfills this requirement, and with Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) computational resources can be allocated according to need. This work presents an Accurate Conservative Level-Set/Ghost-Fluid algorithm for unstructured grids, implemented in the YALES2 incompressible finite-volume flow solver. In the ACLS framework, the interface is defined as the iso-contour of a hyperbolic tangent function, which is advected by the fluid, and reshaped using a reinitialization equation. A new form of this equation, that better preserves the interface shape, has been recently proposed by Chiodi et al, and we extend it to unstructured grids in this study. To compute interface normals and curvature, the signed-distance function is reconstructed in a narrow band around the interface using a geometric-projection marker method. Isotropic AMR is automatically triggered based on interface displacement. Interface transport and two-phase flow tests are firstly simulated to validate the procedure. We then perform LES of a water jet in quiescent air from a low-pressure compound nozzle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207