The Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international: Founding, Function, Future
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Founded in the early 1960s and published annually since 1963, The Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international (‘Canadian Yearbook’) was originally conceived as a means of bringing international legal scholarship to Canada, but also as a venue through which distinctive Canadian perspectives on international law could be incubated and projected to the world. It was also expected to serve both the academic and practising professional communities of international lawyers in Canada, and to do so in both of Canada’s official languages. The Canadian Yearbook has done and continues to do all of these things, but in recent years has sought to broaden not only its readership but also its authorship beyond Canadian shores. It has succeeded in doing so by leveraging the advantages of ‘continuing’ online publication as an accompaniment to the traditional publication of an annual, bound volume. The result has been more timely dissemination of its contents to a growing worldwide readership through, inter alia, an ever-increasing subscription base of academic and other institutional libraries around the globe. As such it seems probable that the Canadian Yearbook, as Canada’s leading scholarly serial publication devoted to international legal issues, will continue to serve as a central pillar not only of Canada’s international legal community but also of Canada’s contributions to international legal scholarship and practice for the foreseeable future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".