First Experiences with <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA Therapy in Combination with Pembrolizumab or After Pretreatment with Olaparib in Single Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synergistic effects of immunotherapy with pembrolizumab or drugs targeting DNA damage, such as olaparib, might be used to overcome the limitations of radioligand therapy (RLT) with <sup>177</sup>Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here, we present 2 patients receiving such combination or sequential therapies. <b>Methods:</b> RLT was performed at 6- to 8-wk intervals after the patients either exhausted or were considered unfit for all approved conventional treatments. Patient 1 was on pembrolizumab for his squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, whereas patient 2 received RLT sequentially 4 wk after 3 mo of monotherapy with olaparib. <b>Results:</b> Both patients tolerated RLT without any significant hematotoxicity. Patient 2 showed a radiologic and biochemical response, whereas patient 1 achieved prostate-specific antigen stabilization after 3 therapy cycles. <b>Conclusion:</b> These cases indicate that RLT in combination with pembrolizumab or sequentially after olaparib might be well tolerated in single patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".