MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107151327

Past, Present, and Future of Solar Neutrino Detection: SNO, SNO+, and Theia

2019· article· en· W3107151327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin Land

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar neutrinoNeutrinoPhysicsScintillatorNeutrino detectorCherenkov radiationSolar neutrino problemNuclear physicsStandard solar modelParticle physicsFlux (metallurgy)Neutrino oscillationEnergy (signal processing)DetectorOpticsMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis represents a comprehensive study of solar neutrinos spanning three generations of solar neutrino detection techniques. Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO), a heavy water detector instrumental in demonstrating flavor change in the neutrino sector, is used to set a limit on the lifetime of massive neutrino states within a model where said states can decay. The analysis of SNO data finds a limit of $k_2>8.08 \\times 10^{-5}$~s/eV at 90\\% confidence for the lifetime of $\\nu_2$. Combining this limit with constraints from all other solar neutrino experiments, a new global best limit is found at $k_2>1.92 \\times 10^{-3}$~s/eV at 90\\% confidence for the lifetime of $\\nu_2$.The upgrade of the SNO detector, SNO+, is currently in the process of migrating to a liquid scintillator target material. Prior to this, SNO+ produced a physics dataset with light water as the target, which was analyzed to extract the flux of $^8$B solar neutrinos. This analysis resulted in a measured flux of $\\Phi_{\\mathrm{^8B}} = 5.95^{+0.75}_{-0.71}\\mathrm{(stat.)}^{+0.28}_{-0.20}\\mathrm{(syst.)} \\times 10^6\\,\\,\\mathrm{cm}^{-2}\\mathrm{s}^{-1}$. Further, this analysis demonstrated SNO+ has achieved very low backgrounds above 6.0~MeV visible energy. To aid in detector calibrations as SNO+ moves from water to scintillator, the design and evaluation of a Cherenkov optical calibration source is presented.With an eye on the future, the capabilities of the proposed Theia experiment are discussed, with particular attention to the novel water-based liquid scintillator target being evaluated for use by that experiment. A small scale experiment to evaluate the prospects of distinguishing scintillation and Cherenkov light in this target is described. Results are presented demonstrating the potential for identification of Cherenkov photons by timing and intensity information for this water-based liquid scintillator, and for a more traditional scintillator, LAB+PPO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207