Genetic associations and architecture of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Some individuals have characteristics of both asthma and COPD (asthma-COPD overlap, ACO), and evidence suggests they experience worse outcomes than those with either condition alone. Improved knowledge of the genetic architecture would contribute to understanding whether determinants of risk in this group differ from those in COPD or asthma. We conducted a genome-wide association study in 8,068 cases and 40,360 controls of European ancestry from UK Biobank (stage 1). After excluding variants only associated with asthma or COPD we selected 31 variants for further investigation in 12 additional cohorts (stage 2), and discovered eight novel signals for ACO in a meta-analysis of stage 1 and 2 studies. Our signals include an intergenic signal on chromosome 5 not previously associated with asthma, COPD or lung function, and suggest a spectrum of shared and distinct genetic influences in asthma, COPD and ACO. A number of signals may represent loci that predispose to serious long-term consequences in people with asthma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".