MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107226357 · doi:10.5209/anha.72183

The 'Royal Journey of Succession to Portugal' of King D. Filipe I of Portugal and the architectonic renovation of the palatine residences: the case of the Royal Palace of Lisbon (Paço da Ribeira)

2020· article· es· W3107226357 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Milton Pedro Dias Pacheco

Bibliographic record

VenueAnales de Historia del Arte · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade de LisboaUniversidade de CoimbraFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaFederation for the Humanities and Social Sciences
KeywordsHumanitiesArtCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the Royal Journey of Succession to Portugal, which started in Madrid in March 1580 and ended in Lisbon in February 1583, the Spanish King Felipe II became D. Filipe I of Portugal. But this political expedition, which resulted in the legitimation of the new king before the old kingdom, would have serious repercussions in the field of palatine architecture, with the renovation of an important set of royal palaces belonging to the Portuguese Crown, integrated since then in the Iberian Dual Monarchy. The detailed analysis of the coeval documentary sources, with an emphasis on the epistolary correspondence produced within the sphere of Prudent-King circle, directly or indirectly, permits to comprehend the initial procedures implemented in the architectural renovation and spatial expansion of the main Portuguese royal palace in Lisbon: the Paço da Ribeira. The political and symbolic dimensions given to the palace building, made in a power scale and strength image of the King himself, must be analysed in the context of the materialization of a ruler who would inevitably leave the kingdom but not its people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnales de Historia del ArteSame topicHistorical Art and Architecture StudiesFrench-language works237,207