Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose Monolith , a monolithic pressure-viscosity-contact solver for more accurately, robustly, and efficiently simulating non-trivial two-way interactions of rigid bodies with inviscid, viscous, or non-Newtonian liquids. Our solver simultaneously handles incompressibility and (optionally) implicit viscosity integration for liquids, contact resolution for rigid bodies, and mutual interactions between liquids and rigid bodies by carefully formulating these as a single unified minimization problem. This monolithic approach reduces or eliminates an array of problematic artifacts, including liquid volume loss, solid interpenetrations, simulation instabilities, artificial "melting" of viscous liquid, and incorrect slip at liquid-solid interfaces. In the absence of solid-solid friction, our minimization problem is a Quadratic Program (QP) with a symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrix and can be treated with a single Linear Complementarity Problem (LCP) solve. When friction is present, we decouple the unified minimization problem into two subproblems so that it can be effectively handled via staggered projections with alternating LCP solves. We also propose a complementary approach for non-Newtonian fluids which can be seamlessly integrated and addressed during the staggered projections. We demonstrate the critical importance of a contact-aware , unified treatment of fluid-solid coupling and the effectiveness of our proposed Monolith solver in a wide range of practical scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".