Hypertension in adolescents and young adults referred to a tertiary hypertension clinic in Cape Town, South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To audit the young patients referred to the Hypertension Clinic at Groote Schuur Hospital that predominately serves the underprivileged communities of Cape Town.Folders of patients between the ages of 15 and 30 years over a 2 year period were reviewed. The data collected included demographic, clinical and laboratory data, investigations, causes of hypertension, and presence of hypertensive organ damage.Of the 110 patients reviewed, 61 (55.5%) were females, 22 (20%) Black African, and 88 (80%) of Mixed Ancestry. Eight (7.3%) were found to be normotensive, 16 (14.5%) had a secondary cause and 86 (78.2%) had essential hypertension. Thirty five (31.8%) were current or previous smokers, and 11 (10%) admitted to current or prior use of metamphetamines. A family history of hypertension in a first degree relative was present in 80 (72.7%) patients. Comorbidities present were diabetes in 7 (6.4%) patients, metabolic syndrome in 13 (11.8%), and obesity in 26 (23.6%), but 42.6% had a body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was present in 29 (26.4%) patients and ECG left ventricular hypertrophy in 56 (50.9%). Overall organ damage was present in 72 (65.5%) patients.In this cohort of young hypertensives most patients had essential hypertension with a strong family history. Significant organ damage was identified. High risk behavior, including smoking and illicit drug use, and obesity were identified as contributing factors. Secondary causes were identified in 14.2%. These results suggest a targeted approach to the investigation of young hypertensives for secondary causes, and significant opportunities for lifestyle intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".