MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107346707 · doi:10.1002/anie.202014061

Transition of the Reaction from Three‐Phase to Two‐Phase by Using a Hybrid Conductor for High‐Energy‐Density High‐Rate Solid‐State Li‐O<sub>2</sub> Batteries

2020· article· en· W3107346707 on OpenAlexafffund
Changtai Zhao, Yuanmin Zhu, Qian Sun, Changhong Wang, Jing Luo, Xiaoting Lin, Xiaofei Yang, Yang Zhao, Ruying Li, Shangqian Zhao, Huan Huang, Li Zhang, Shigang Lu, Meng Gu, Xueliang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationWestern UniversityCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsGLABAT Solid-State BatteryChina Automotive Battery Research Institute
KeywordsBattery (electricity)ElectrodeMaterials scienceConductorPhase (matter)ElectrochemistryPhase transitionIonic bondingChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsPower (physics)Ion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solid‐state Li‐O 2 batteries possess the ability to deliver high energy density with enhanced safety. However, designing a highly functional solid‐state air electrode is the main bottleneck for its further development. Herein, we adopt a hybrid electronic and ionic conductor to build solid‐state air electrode that makes the transition of Li‐O 2 battery electrochemical mechanism from a three‐phase process to a two‐phase process. The solid‐state Li‐O 2 battery with this hybrid conductor solid‐state air electrode shows decreased interfacial resistance and enhanced reaction kinetics. The Coulombic efficiency of Li‐O 2 battery is also significantly improved, benefiting from the good contact between discharge products and electrode materials. In situ environmental transmission electron microscopy under oxygen was used to illustrate the reversible deposition and decomposition of discharge products on the surface of this hybrid conductor, visually verifying the two‐phase reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207