PENGARUH BUDAYA ORGANISASI, LINGKUNGAN KERJA DAN KOMPETENSI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI DINAS PERTANIAN DAN PERKEBUNAN KABUPATEN BIMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research is aimed to find out a partial and/or simultaneous influence of organizational culture, working environment, and competence of employees toward their working performance. The method used is a descriptive quantitative method using a questionnaire technique. Data were gained and collected since June to September 2019 by questionnaires distributed to 119 civil servants working in Agriculture and Plantation Services of Bima Regency. Furthermore, data were analyzed and processed using SPSSver.22 data processing tool for windows. Results of the analysis then interpreted and narrated descriptively. The results indicated that organizational culture (X1), working environment (X2), and competence (X3) as partially effect very much employees working performance (Y) in Agriculture and Plantation Services of Bima Regency. It shows the value of the t-test results for each variable, namely X1: 4.779> t table 1.98; X2: 3,327> t table 1,98; and X3: 6,207> table 1.98.Keywords: organizational culture, working environment, competence, and performance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".