Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Acute Liver Failure: A Prospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare disease that may lead to cerebral edema and death. An increased optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) may reflect an early increase in intracranial pressure. We assessed the feasibility and safety of the ONSD measurement and its association with outcomes in patients with ALF. Methods: This was an open-label prospective cohort study including adult patients with ALF admitted to a liver-specialized intensive care unit (ICU) in an academic center between October 2018 and February 2020 (among 24): 20 as intention-to-treat and 17 as per-protocol analyses. The ONSD measurement (primary exposure) used an ultrasound transducer (3 determinations on each eye per patient). The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Results: Among the 20 patients, 11 (55.0%) were females and the mean age was 45 ± 16 years. On the day of ONSD measurement (median 32.4 h post-ICU admission; IQR 19.8–59.8): 8 patients (40.0%) were in a coma, the mean international normalized ratio (INR) was 3.3 ± 1.4, median bilirubin was 12.3 mg/dL (IQR 4.7–24.5), mean ammonia was 163 ± 101 µmol/L, and mean SOFA score was 11 ± 5. The mean bilateral ONSD was 5.6 ± 0.7 mm, with a very good correlation between right and left eyes (Pearson’s r = 0.90). Ten (50.0%) patients were transplanted and 13 (65.0%) patients survived the hospital stay (all with a 2-month extended Glasgow Outcome Scale of 8). The mean ONSD was significantly higher for hospital non-survivors than survivors both in the intention-to-treat (6.2 vs. 5.3 mm; p = 0.004) and per-protocol (6.2 vs. 5.2 mm; p = 0.004) analyses. No adverse effects from ONSD measurements were reported. Conclusions: In patients with ALF, a higher ONSD was associated with higher hospital mortality. ONSD measurement is feasible and safe and may have prognostic value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".