Prevalence and prognostic value of left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement in patients with idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Patients with idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OTVAs) and structurally normal heart by ECG and echocardiogram often undergo cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study to evaluate for presence of concealed myocardial abnormalities with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). However, the clinical impact of incidental LGE finding in the left ventricle (LV) in patients with idiopathic OT-VAs is unclear. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence, characteristics and prognostic significance of isolated LV LGE in a large population of patients with OTVA undergoing CMR. Methods A total of 364 consecutive patients (43±16 years, 53% male) with OTVA and negative routine diagnostic work-up were included. All patients underwent a CMR study with LGE imaging for detection of scar/replacement fibrosis. Presence of LGE was correlated with long term major adverse cardiovascular events including sudden cardiac death (SCD), resuscitated cardiac arrest and nonfatal documented sustained ventricular tachycardia. Results Isolated LGE in the LV was identified in 15 patients (4%), typically involving the inferolateral wall (11 cases, 73%) and having a median extension of 3 (2–5)% of the LV mass. All cases showed a midmyocardial/subepicardial distribution consistent with a possible prior myocarditis. Patients with incidental finding of LV-LGE were older (55±13 years vs. 42±16 years; p<0.01) and were more frequently males (80% vs. 51%; p=0.03). After a median follow-up of 69 (47–98) months, none of the patients in the LV-LGE group and 1 patient (0.3%) in the non-LGE group (p=1.0) experienced the composite end-point which consisted in an episode of sustained VT with hypotension and dizziness. The patient subsequently underwent effective radiofrequency ablation of the VT from the right ventricular outflow tract. Conclusion In this large CMR study, isolated LV scar was found in 4% of patients with idiopathic OT-VAs, was small in size with distribution consistent with prior myocarditis. The LGE abnormality did not portend a negative prognosis. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".