MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107651515 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10501695.1

Observing the ‘Spheres with the EarthScope Transportable Array

2020· article· en· W3107651515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kasey Aderhold, Robert Busby, Robert S. Woodward, F. L. Vernon, A. Frassetto, Michael A. H. Hedlin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware deploymentGeospatial analysisTerrainGeologySeismologyGridGeophoneMeteorologyRemote sensingEngineeringGeographyCartographyGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The motivation and objective of the EarthScope Transportable Array (TA) is to record earthquake signals and image the structure of the North American plate, however the observations collected by this National Science Foundation funded project have enabled unanticipated discoveries, innovative data analysis techniques, and ongoing investigations across many disciplines in the Earth and space sciences. The Transportable Array utilized a survey approach to collect data in which high-quality stations were systematically installed in a dense geospatial grid. From the very beginning of the deployment, this strategy allowed for data-driven discovery, such as using seismic data to map out extensive travel time curves for acoustic waves in the atmosphere (Hedlin et al., 2010). While the emplacement of the seismic sensors was kept uniform along with the core components for power and communications, the Transportable Array station design evolved over time to include additional barometric pressure and infrasound sensors and, eventually, meteorological sensors measuring external temperature, wind, and precipitation. As the array rolled across the Lower 48 and the TA became more recognized outside of seismology, collaborations were forged and strengthened with researchers in the infrasound and meteorological communities. Along with standard approaches using direct measurements, inventive techniques were used to apply environmental data for observing tectonic phenomena as well as applying seismic data for observing environmental phenomena. The value of integrated scientific infrastructure became even more apparent with the Transportable Array deployment in Alaska and western Canada, with autonomous and telemetered stations occupying sites within large swaths of previously unmonitored and inaccessible terrain. The majority of Alaska TA stations collect weather data and a subset also include a detached soil temperature probe. As a result, data collected by the Alaska Transportable Array have been used to observe throughout the ‘spheres: the lithosphere (earthquakes, volcanoes, landslides), the cryosphere (sea ice), the hydrosphere (precipitation, fire preparation), the atmosphere and biosphere (weather forecasting, storm systems, bolides), and even into the magnetosphere (space weather).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207