MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3107715002 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2570

Chromogranin B is associated with impaired coronary collateralization and heart failure in patients with stable angina and chronic total occlusion

2020· article· en· W3107715002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ying Shen, X.Q Wang, Feng Ding, Zeyong Yang, Lin Lu, Ruicheng Zhang, Wei Feng Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollateralizationMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineAnginaHeart failureCoronary artery diseaseCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chromogranin B (CgB) is a member of granin family that can be cleaved into a number of bioactive peptides. Previous studies showed that CgB is produced in cardiomyocytes and is increased in heart failure animals and patients in proportion to disease severity. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of coronary artery leads to sustained myocardial ischemia which predisposes to adverse cardiovascular outcomes including heart failure. Purpose In this study, we sought to investigate the association between CgB and coronary collateralization formation and heart failure in patients with stable angina and CTO. Methods A total of 720 subjects with stable angina and CTO of at least one major coronary artery were enrolled in this study. CgB was assayed using an ELISA kit and the degree of coronary collaterals supplying the distal aspect of a total occlusion from the contralateral vessel was graded according to Rentrop classification. Results These was a stepwise decrease in levels of CgB with increasing Rentrop grades of coronary collateralization (P=0.001). Compared with the good collateralization (Rentrop grade 2–3) group, CgB was significantly higher in subjects with poor coronary collateralization (Rentrop grade 0–1; 1222.95 [IQR 506.24–2710.24] pg/mL vs. 776.17 [IQR 276.24–2209.39] pg/mL, P<0.001). Consistent results were found across subgroups of age, sex and the presence of diagnosed diabetes. In subjects with poor collateralization, CgB was positively correlated to N-terminal–pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (both log-transformed; Pearson's r=0.280, P=0.005). This correlation was markedly enhanced (Pearson's r=0.501, P<0.001) in the poorly-collateralized heart failure subgroup with left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. Consistently, an inverse correlation was present between log-transformed CgB and LVEF (Pearson's r=−0.528, P<0.001) in the same subgroup. After adjusting for conventional confounding factors and LVEF, CgB remained significantly associated with impaired coronary collateralization (odds ratio: 1.314 [95% CI 1.097–1.590], P=0.004). Inclusion of CgB led to a better diagnostic accuracy as confirmed by net reclassification improvement (NRI) of 17.70% (95% CI 8.08–27.32%, P<0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of 1.98% (95% CI 0.63–3.34%, P=0.004). Conclusions CgB is an independent predictor of poor coronary collateralization and is related to worse heart function in patients with stable angina and CTO. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Natural Science Foundation of China

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→